Trump’s $1,000 Retirement Match: No Fiscal Authority, No Good Reason
Jessica Hall reports on President Trump’s plan “to create retirement-savings plans for workers who don’t have access to one through their employer, offering up to $1,000 a year in matching funds” for MarketWatch. Romina Boccia explains why the plan would require congressional authorization — and why lawmakers should think twice before approving it:
“Americans are still waiting on their tariff rebate checks and DOGE dividend checks. Not only does the administration lack the fiscal authority to seed 401(k)s with a $1,000 taxpayer match, nor is this a good idea,” Romina Boccia, director of budget and entitlement policy at the Cato Institute, said in an emailed statement after Trump’s comments. “Americans need a simpler system of tax-advantaged savings via universal savings accounts, not more tax-advantaged accounts (i.e….
PROCUREMENT & EXPENDITURE (STOPPING KICKBACKS)
Procurement fraud usually involves inflated invoices or “fictitious” vendors.
- The Three-Way Match: Never pay an invoice unless you have matched the Purchase Order (PO), the Delivery Note (signed), and the Supplier Invoice.
- Vendor Master File Review: Review your vendor list annually. Look for suppliers with the same bank details or physical addresses as your employees.
- Dual Authorization: Implement a “Two-to-Sign” rule for all EFT payments above a certain threshold (e.g., R5,000).
- No “Cashing” of Checks: If you still use physical checks, strictly prohibit “Cash” as a payee and store blank checks in a dual-lock safe.